Oppo Reno12 F 4G
$349
Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Galaxy A35
$367
| Reno12 F 4G | Galaxy A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 349 | USD 367 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 25 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos Exynos 1380 |
| Display | 6.67" • Rigid AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 18 cheaper
Reno12 F 4GUSD 349
vsGalaxy A35USD 367
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Reno12 F 4G45 W wired
vsGalaxy A3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno12 F 4GQualcomm Snapdragon 685
vsGalaxy A35Samsung Exynos Exynos 1380
Build
22 g lighter
Reno12 F 4G187 g
vsGalaxy A35209 g
Build
More compact thickness
Reno12 F 4G7.69 mm
vsGalaxy A358.2 mm
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
Reno12 F 4G32MP front
vsGalaxy A3513MP front
Connectivity
Adds 5G
Galaxy A355G
vsReno12 F 4GNo 5G listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOppo Reno12 F 4G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 349
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Lighter build187 g
Thinner body7.69 mm
Best if you want
5G connectivitySamsung Galaxy A35
5G connectivity5G
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A35
Oppo Reno12 F 4G offers faster wired charging than Galaxy A35, with 45 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP).
