Samsung Galaxy A33
$369
Samsung Galaxy A33 vs vivo V50
vivo V50
$410
| Galaxy A33 | V50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 369 | USD 410 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.77" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 41 cheaper
Galaxy A33USD 369
vsV50USD 410
RAM
2× more RAM
V5012 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A336 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
V50256 GB
vsGalaxy A33128 GB
Battery
20% larger battery
V506,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A335,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
V5090 W wired
vsGalaxy A3325 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A33Samsung Exynos 1280
vsV50Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Display
Larger120Hz
V506.77″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A336.4″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A33
Much lower purchase priceUSD 369
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo V50
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.77″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A33 vs vivo V50
vivo V50 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A33, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 13 MP) and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A33, however, is cheaper at around $369 versus $410. The main trade-off is V50’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A33’s lower price.
