Oppo Reno12 F 4G
$349
Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A33
Samsung Galaxy A33
$369
| Reno12 F 4G | Galaxy A33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 349 | USD 369 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 25 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
| Display | 6.67" • Rigid AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 48MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 20 cheaper
Reno12 F 4GUSD 349
vsGalaxy A33USD 369
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Reno12 F 4G8 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A336 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno12 F 4G256 GB
vsGalaxy A33128 GB
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Reno12 F 4G45 W wired
vsGalaxy A3325 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno12 F 4GQualcomm Snapdragon 685
vsGalaxy A33Samsung Exynos 1280
Display
Larger120Hz
Reno12 F 4G6.67″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A336.4″ · 90Hz
Build
More compact thickness
Reno12 F 4G7.69 mm
vsGalaxy A338.1 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo Reno12 F 4G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 349
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.67″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A33
Oppo Reno12 F 4G offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Galaxy A33, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 45 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP).
