Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB
$199
Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB vs Vivo V17
Vivo V17
$385
| Galaxy A16 8GB | V17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 199 | USD 385 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 18 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 AIE |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.44" • E3 Super AMOLED • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 48MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 9 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 186 cheaper
Galaxy A16 8GBUSD 199
vsV17USD 385
Battery
11% larger battery
Galaxy A16 8GB5,000 mAh
vsV174,500 mAh
Charging
7 W faster wired charging
Galaxy A16 8GB25 W wired
vsV1718 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A16 8GBMediaTek Helio G99
vsV17Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 AIE
Display
Larger90Hz
Galaxy A16 8GB6.7″ · 90Hz
vsV176.44″ · 60Hz
Build
24 g lighter
V17176 g
vsGalaxy A16 8GB200 g
Build
More compact thickness
Galaxy A16 8GB7.9 mm
vsV178.54 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A16 8GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 199
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging25 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.7″ · 90Hz
Best if you want
More compactVivo V17
Lighter build176 g
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB vs Vivo V17
Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB has the larger display and faster wired charging than V17, with a 5000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 25 W wired charging versus 18 W. Vivo V17, however, is lighter at 176 g versus 200 g and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The main trade-off is the Galaxy A16 8GB’s faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the V17’s lighter build and higher-resolution front camera.
