Samsung Galaxy A01
$110
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| Galaxy A01 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 110 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 44 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 5.7" • PLS TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 141 cheaper
Galaxy A01USD 110
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
2× more RAM
Y32 (2026)4 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A012 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vsGalaxy A0116 GB
Battery
167% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A013,000 mAh
Charging
39 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsGalaxy A015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A01Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A015.7″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A01
Much lower purchase priceUSD 110
Smaller 5.7-inch display5.7″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A01 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A01, with 4 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 16 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 3000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), NFC, and 44W charging. Samsung Galaxy A01, however, is around $141 cheaper, lighter at 149 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 8.3 mm versus 8.69 mm. The choice comes down to Y32 (2026)’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A01’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
