POCO C85
$109
POCO C85 vs ZTE Nubia A36
ZTE Nubia A36
$65
| C85 | Nubia A36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 109 | USD 65 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra | Unisoc T606 |
| Display | 6.9" • IPS LCD • 120Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 44 cheaper
Nubia A36USD 65
vsC85USD 109
RAM
2 GB more RAM
C856 GB RAM
vsNubia A364 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
C85128 GB
vsNubia A3664 GB
Battery
20% larger battery
C856,000 mAh
vsNubia A365,000 mAh
Charging
23 W faster wired charging
C8533 W wired
vsNubia A3610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C85MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra
vsNubia A36Unisoc T606
Display
Larger120Hz
C856.9″ · 120Hz
vsNubia A366.75″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO C85
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging33 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.9″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Nubia A36
Much lower purchase priceUSD 65
Smaller 6.75-inch display6.75″
What CompareTab says about POCO C85 vs ZTE Nubia A36
POCO C85 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Nubia A36, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), NFC, and 33W charging. ZTE Nubia A36, however, is cheaper at around $65 versus $109 and lighter at 192 g versus 205 g. The main trade-off is the C85’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Nubia A36’s lower price and lighter build.
