POCO C75
$149
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| C75 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 44 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.88" • IPS LCD Dot Drop Display • 120Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 102 cheaper
C75USD 149
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
2× more RAM
C758 GB RAM
vsY32 (2026)4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
C75256 GB
vsY32 (2026)128 GB
Battery
55% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsC755,160 mAh
Charging
26 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsC7518 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C75MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Build
25 g lighter
C75204 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower pricePOCO C75
Much lower purchase priceUSD 149
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Lighter build204 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
What CompareTab says about POCO C75 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
POCO C75 offers more RAM and storage than Y32 (2026), with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB and 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 8 MP). vivo Y32 (2026), however, has a larger 8000 mAh battery versus 5160 mAh and higher quoted peak brightness at 1300 nits versus 600 nits and supports faster wired charging at 44 W versus 18 W. The main trade-off is C75’s extra RAM, storage, and higher-resolution front camera versus Y32 (2026)’s larger battery, higher quoted peak brightness, and faster charging.
