POCO C75
$149
POCO C75 vs ZTE Blade A35
ZTE Blade A35
$99
| C75 | Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 99 |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra | UNISOC SC9863A1 |
| Display | 6.88" • IPS LCD Dot Drop Display • 120Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
Blade A35USD 99
vsC75USD 149
RAM
2× more RAM
C758 GB RAM
vsBlade A354 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
C75256 GB
vsBlade A3564 GB
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
C7518 W wired
vsBlade A3510 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C75MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra
vsBlade A35UNISOC SC9863A1
Display
120 Hz refresh
C75120 Hz
vsBlade A3590 Hz
Build
12 g lighter
Blade A35192 g
vsC75204 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO C75
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.88-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Blade A35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Lighter build192 g
What CompareTab says about POCO C75 vs ZTE Blade A35
POCO C75 offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Blade A35, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 5 MP), and NFC. ZTE Blade A35, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and lighter at 192 g versus 204 g. The main trade-off is the C75’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus the Blade A35’s lower price and lighter build.
