POCO C71
$89
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| C71 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 89 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 44 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | UNISOC T7250 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.88" • IPS LCD • 120Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 15 Go Edition | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 162 cheaper
C71USD 89
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
Battery
54% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsC715,200 mAh
Charging
29 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsC7115 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C71UNISOC T7250
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Build
36 g lighter
C71193 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
Y32 (2026)50MP rear
vsC7132MP rear
Build
More compact thickness
C718.26 mm
vsY32 (2026)8.69 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower pricePOCO C71
Much lower purchase priceUSD 89
Lighter build193 g
Thinner body8.26 mm
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Higher-resolution main camera50MP rear
What CompareTab says about POCO C71 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) offers a larger battery and faster wired charging than C71, with a 8000 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh and 44 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and NFC. POCO C71, however, is around $162 cheaper, lighter at 193 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 8.26 mm versus 8.69 mm. The choice comes down to Y32 (2026)’s faster charging, battery capacity, and higher-resolution front camera versus C71’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
