POCO C71
$89
POCO C71 vs Alcatel OT-222
Alcatel OT-222
$39
| C71 | OT-222 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 89 | USD 39 |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 650 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 2.5 |
| RAM | 4 GB | N/A |
| Storage | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | UNISOC T7250 | N/A |
| Display | 6.88" • IPS LCD • 120Hz | 1.45" • CSTN LCD, 65K colors • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 32MP | N/A |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 0MP |
| OS | Android 15 Go Edition | Proprietary Alcatel feature-phone platform |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
OT-222USD 39
vsC71USD 89
Storage
4× more storage
OT-222512 GB
vsC71128 GB
Battery
700% larger battery
C715,200 mAh
vsOT-222650 mAh
Charging
13 W faster wired charging
C7115 W wired
vsOT-2223 W wired
Display
Larger120Hz
C716.88″ · 120Hz
vsOT-2221.45″ · 60Hz
Build
122 g lighter
OT-22271 g
vsC71193 g
Build
More compact thickness
C718.26 mm
vsOT-22211.3 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO C71
Larger battery5,200 mAh
Faster wired charging15 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.88″ · 120Hz
Thinner body8.26 mm
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel OT-222
Much lower purchase priceUSD 39
More storage512 GB
Lighter build71 g
Smaller 1.45-inch display1.45″
What CompareTab says about POCO C71 vs Alcatel OT-222
POCO C71 has the larger display and faster wired charging than OT-222, with a 5200 mAh battery versus 650 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 15 W wired charging versus 2.5 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP). Alcatel OT-222, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and lighter at 71 g versus 193 g and offers 512 GB of storage versus 128 GB. The choice comes down to C71’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus OT-222’s lower price and lighter build.
