Oppo Reno16 FS
$890
Oppo Reno16 FS vs vivo Y600
vivo Y600
$300
| Reno16 FS | Y600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 890 | USD 300 |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 44 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Display | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.83" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 16 | OriginOS 6 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 590 cheaper
Y600USD 300
vsReno16 FSUSD 890
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Reno16 FS8 GB RAM
vsY6006 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Reno16 FS512 GB
vsY600128 GB
Battery
54% larger battery
Y60010,000 mAh
vsReno16 FS6,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno16 FSMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
vsY600MediaTek Dimensity 7300e
Display
Larger display
Y6006.83-inch
vsReno16 FS6.57-inch
Build
30 g lighter
Reno16 FS194 g
vsY600224 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactOppo Reno16 FS
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 512 GB
Lighter build194 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y600
Much lower purchase priceUSD 300
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Larger 6.83-inch6.83-inch
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno16 FS vs vivo Y600
Oppo Reno16 FS offers more RAM and a more versatile camera setup than Y600, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a higher-resolution 50 MP front camera versus 8 MP, an ultrawide rear camera, and a telephoto rear camera. vivo Y600, however, is around $590 cheaper and has a larger 10000 mAh battery versus 6500 mAh, a larger 6.83 inch display, and higher quoted peak brightness at 2000 nits versus 1400 nits. The choice comes down to Reno16 FS’s extra RAM, storage, and camera features versus Y600’s lower price, larger battery, larger display, and higher quoted peak brightness.
