Oppo Reno16 FS
$890
Oppo Reno16 FS vs Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17
$1,150
| Reno16 FS | 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 890 | USD 1,150 |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.3" • CrystalRes OLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 260 cheaper
Reno16 FSUSD 890
vs17USD 1,150
RAM
4 GB more RAM
1712 GB RAM
vsReno16 FS8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno16 FS512 GB
vs17256 GB
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
17100 W wired
vsReno16 FS45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno16 FSMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
vs17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display
Larger display
Reno16 FS6.57-inch
vs176.3-inch
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo Reno16 FS
Much lower purchase priceUSD 890
More storage512 GB
Larger 6.57-inch6.57-inch
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi 17
More RAM12 GB RAM
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno16 FS vs Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Reno16 FS, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB and 100 W wired charging versus 45 W. Oppo Reno16 FS, however, is around $260 cheaper, has a larger 6.57 inch display, and offers 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB. The main trade-off is 17’s extra RAM and faster charging versus Reno16 FS’s lower price and larger display.
