Oppo Reno16 FS
$890
Oppo Reno16 FS vs iQOO Neo12
iQOO Neo12
$660
| Reno16 FS | Neo12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 890 | USD 660 |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 9000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 230 cheaper
Neo12USD 660
vsReno16 FSUSD 890
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Neo1212 GB RAM
vsReno16 FS8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno16 FS512 GB
vsNeo12256 GB
Battery
38% larger battery
Neo129,000 mAh
vsReno16 FS6,500 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
Neo12100 W wired
vsReno16 FS45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno16 FSMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
vsNeo12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display
Larger185Hz
Neo126.83″ · 185Hz
vsReno16 FS6.57″ · 120Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More storageOppo Reno16 FS
More storage512 GB
Best if you want
More hardwareiQOO Neo12
Much lower purchase priceUSD 660
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery9,000 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno16 FS vs iQOO Neo12
iQOO Neo12 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Reno16 FS, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 9000 mAh battery versus 6500 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 45 W. Oppo Reno16 FS, however, is lighter at 194 g versus 225 g, has a higher-resolution 50 MP front camera, and offers 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB. The main trade-off is the Neo12’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Reno16 FS’s lighter build and higher-resolution front camera.
