Oppo Reno16 FS
$890
Oppo Reno16 FS vs Honor Win RT2
Honor Win RT2
$674
| Reno16 FS | Win RT2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 890 | USD 674 |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 12070 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.89" • OLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 216 cheaper
Win RT2USD 674
vsReno16 FSUSD 890
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Win RT212 GB RAM
vsReno16 FS8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno16 FS512 GB
vsWin RT2256 GB
Battery
86% larger battery
Win RT212,070 mAh
vsReno16 FS6,500 mAh
Charging
45 W faster wired charging
Win RT290 W wired
vsReno16 FS45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno16 FSMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
vsWin RT2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display
Larger185Hz
Win RT26.89″ · 185Hz
vsReno16 FS6.57″ · 120Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More storageOppo Reno16 FS
More storage512 GB
Best if you want
More hardwareHonor Win RT2
Much lower purchase priceUSD 674
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery12,070 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
What CompareTab says about Oppo Reno16 FS vs Honor Win RT2
Honor Win RT2 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Reno16 FS, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 12070 mAh battery versus 6500 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 45 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP). Oppo Reno16 FS, however, is lighter at 194 g versus 238 g and offers 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB. The choice comes down to Win RT2’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Reno16 FS’s lighter build.
