OPPO Reno13 F
$309
OPPO Reno13 F vs vivo X500
vivo X500
$764
| Reno13 F | X500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 309 | USD 764 |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M |
| Display | 6.67" • Rigid AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 455 cheaper
Reno13 FUSD 309
vsX500USD 764
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X50012 GB RAM
vsReno13 F8 GB RAM
Battery
29% larger battery
X5007,500 mAh
vsReno13 F5,800 mAh
Charging
45 W faster wired charging
X50090 W wired
vsReno13 F45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno13 FMediaTek Helio G100
vsX500MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display
144 Hz refresh
X500144 Hz
vsReno13 F120 Hz
Build
19 g lighter
Reno13 F192 g
vsX500211 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO Reno13 F
Much lower purchase priceUSD 309
Lighter build192 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO Reno13 F vs vivo X500
vivo X500 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Reno13 F, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 5800 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 45 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and a telephoto rear camera. OPPO Reno13 F, however, is around $455 cheaper, lighter at 192 g versus 211 g, and thinner at 7.76 mm versus 8.15 mm. The main trade-off is the X500’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus the Reno13 F’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
