motorola Moto G72
$230
motorola Moto G72 vs OPPO Reno13 F
OPPO Reno13 F
$309
| Moto G72 | Reno13 F | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 230 | USD 309 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 45 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G100 |
| Display | 6.6" • pOLED • 120Hz | 6.67" • Rigid AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 108MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 79 cheaper
Moto G72USD 230
vsReno13 FUSD 309
Storage
2× more storage
Reno13 F256 GB
vsMoto G72128 GB
Battery
16% larger battery
Reno13 F5,800 mAh
vsMoto G725,000 mAh
Charging
12 W faster wired charging
Reno13 F45 W wired
vsMoto G7233 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Moto G72MediaTek Helio G99
vsReno13 FMediaTek Helio G100
Build
26 g lighter
Moto G72166 g
vsReno13 F192 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
Moto G72108MP rear
vsReno13 F50MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower pricemotorola Moto G72
Much lower purchase priceUSD 230
Lighter build166 g
Higher-resolution main camera108MP rear
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno13 F
More storage256 GB
Larger battery5,800 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
What CompareTab says about motorola Moto G72 vs OPPO Reno13 F
OPPO Reno13 F offers more storage than Moto G72, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 5800 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and 45 W wired charging versus 33 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 16 MP). motorola Moto G72, however, is around $79.00 cheaper and lighter at 166 g versus 192 g and has higher quoted peak brightness at 1300 nits versus 1200 nits. The choice comes down to Reno13 F’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and higher-resolution front camera versus Moto G72’s lower price, higher quoted peak brightness, and lighter build.
