OPPO A16
$190
OPPO A16 vs OPPO Reno13 F
OPPO Reno13 F
$309
| A16 | Reno13 F | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 190 | USD 309 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 45 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 | MediaTek Helio G100 |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.67" • Rigid AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 119 cheaper
A16USD 190
vsReno13 FUSD 309
RAM
2× more RAM
Reno13 F8 GB RAM
vsA164 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Reno13 F256 GB
vsA1664 GB
Battery
16% larger battery
Reno13 F5,800 mAh
vsA165,000 mAh
Charging
35 W faster wired charging
Reno13 F45 W wired
vsA1610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16MediaTek Helio G35
vsReno13 FMediaTek Helio G100
Display
Larger120Hz
Reno13 F6.67″ · 120Hz
vsA166.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16
Much lower purchase priceUSD 190
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno13 F
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery5,800 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.67″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16 vs OPPO Reno13 F
OPPO Reno13 F offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 5800 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 45W charging. OPPO A16, however, is around $119 cheaper. The main trade-off is Reno13 F’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16’s lower price.
