OPPO A38
$219
OPPO A38 vs Oppo Reno12 F 5G
Oppo Reno12 F 5G
$379
| A38 | Reno12 F 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 219 | USD 379 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 45 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Display | 6.56" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 160 cheaper
A38USD 219
vsReno12 F 5GUSD 379
RAM
2× more RAM
Reno12 F 5G12 GB RAM
vsA386 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno12 F 5G256 GB
vsA38128 GB
Charging
12 W faster wired charging
Reno12 F 5G45 W wired
vsA3833 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A38MediaTek Helio G85
vsReno12 F 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6300
Display
120 Hz refresh
Reno12 F 5G120 Hz
vsA3890 Hz
Build
More compact thickness
Reno12 F 5G7.76 mm
vsA388.16 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A38
Much lower purchase priceUSD 219
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo Reno12 F 5G
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.67-inch
Thinner body7.76 mm
What CompareTab says about OPPO A38 vs Oppo Reno12 F 5G
Oppo Reno12 F 5G combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than A38, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 45 W wired charging versus 33 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 5 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and NFC. OPPO A38, however, is around $160 cheaper. The main trade-off is Reno12 F 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and camera features versus A38’s lower price.
