Nokia X20
$419
Nokia X20 vs Oppo Reno16 5G
Oppo Reno16 5G
$749
| X20 | Reno16 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 419 | USD 749 |
| Battery | 4470 mAh | 6700 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 80 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Display | 6.67" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.32" • Crystal Guard+ AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 330 cheaper
X20USD 419
vsReno16 5GUSD 749
RAM
2× more RAM
Reno16 5G12 GB RAM
vsX206 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno16 5G256 GB
vsX20128 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
Reno16 5G6,700 mAh
vsX204,470 mAh
Charging
62 W faster wired charging
Reno16 5G80 W wired
vsX2018 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
X20Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
vsReno16 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Display
Larger display
X206.67-inch
vsReno16 5G6.32-inch
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia X20
Much lower purchase priceUSD 419
Larger 6.67-inch6.67-inch
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo Reno16 5G
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,700 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
What CompareTab says about Nokia X20 vs Oppo Reno16 5G
Oppo Reno16 5G has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over X20, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6700 mAh battery versus 4470 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, a telephoto rear camera, and 80W charging. Nokia X20, however, is around $330 cheaper and has a larger 6.67 inch display. The main trade-off is Reno16 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus X20’s lower price and larger display.
