Nokia X20
$419
Nokia X20 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| X20 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 419 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 4470 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.67" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 280 cheaper
X20USD 419
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
2× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsX206 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsX20128 GB
Battery
42% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsX204,470 mAh
Charging
82 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsX2018 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
X20Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsX2060 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia X20
Much lower purchase priceUSD 419
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Nokia X20 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over X20, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 4470 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, a telephoto rear camera, and 100W charging. Nokia X20, however, is around $280 cheaper. The main trade-off is F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus X20’s lower price.
