Nokia 6300 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A12

close
Nokia 6300 4G

Nokia 6300 4G

$69

0 GB RAM 4 GB

close
Samsung Galaxy A12

Samsung Galaxy A12

$179

4 GB RAM 128 GB

6300 4GGalaxy A12
PriceUSD 69USD 179
Battery1500 mAh5000 mAh
Charging (W)N/A15
RAMN/A4 GB
Storage4 GB128 GB
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210MediaTek Helio P35
Display2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz6.5" • PLS TFT LCD • 60Hz
Main Camera0.3MP48MP
Front Camera0MP8MP
OSKaiOS 2.5Android 10

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 110 cheaper
vsGalaxy A12USD 179
RAM
4 GB more RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
32× more storage
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
233% larger battery
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
vsGalaxy A12MediaTek Helio P35
Display
Larger display
vs6300 4G2.4-inch
Build
100 g lighter
vsGalaxy A12205 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Nokia 6300 4G

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build104.7 g
Smaller 2.4-inch display2.4″
Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A12

More hardware
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Larger 6.5-inch6.5-inch

What CompareTab says about Nokia 6300 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A12

Samsung Galaxy A12 offers more RAM, storage and a larger battery than 6300 4G, with 4 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 6.5 inch display versus 2.4 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (48 MP versus 0.3 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP), and an ultrawide rear camera. Nokia 6300 4G, however, is around $110 cheaper and lighter at 104.7 g versus 205 g. The choice comes down to Galaxy A12’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, larger display, and camera features versus 6300 4G’s lower price and lighter build.