Nokia 6.2
$249
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| 6.2 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 249 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 44 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.3" • IPS LCD PureDisplay • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 16MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 9 Pie | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Storage
2× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vs6.264 GB
Battery
129% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vs6.23,500 mAh
Charging
34 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vs6.210 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
6.2Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vs6.26.3″ · 60Hz
Build
49 g lighter
6.2180 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
Y32 (2026)50MP rear
vs6.216MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactNokia 6.2
Lighter build180 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More storage128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6.2 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than 6.2, with 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 3500 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP). Nokia 6.2, however, is lighter at 180 g versus 229 g and thinner at 8.25 mm versus 8.69 mm. The choice comes down to Y32 (2026)’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus 6.2’s lighter, thinner build.
