Nokia 6.2
$249
Nokia 6.2 vs OnePlus 16
OnePlus 16
$844
| 6.2 | 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 249 | USD 844 |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 9000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 (SM8975) |
| Display | 6.3" • IPS LCD PureDisplay • 60Hz | 6.78" • LTPO flexible OLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 16MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 9 Pie | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 595 cheaper
6.2USD 249
vs16USD 844
RAM
3× more RAM
1612 GB RAM
vs6.24 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
16256 GB
vs6.264 GB
Battery
157% larger battery
169,000 mAh
vs6.23,500 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
16100 W wired
vs6.210 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
6.2Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
vs16Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 (SM8975)
Display
Larger185Hz
166.78″ · 185Hz
vs6.26.3″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 6.2
Much lower purchase priceUSD 249
Smaller 6.3-inch display6.3″
Best if you want
More hardwareOnePlus 16
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery9,000 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.78″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6.2 vs OnePlus 16
OnePlus 16 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 6.2, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 9000 mAh battery versus 3500 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 16 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 100W charging. Nokia 6.2, however, is around $595 cheaper, lighter at 180 g versus 220 g, and thinner at 8.25 mm versus 8.55 mm. The main trade-off is the 16’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the 6.2’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
