Nokia 6.2
$249
Nokia 6.2 vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE
$410
| 6.2 | S2 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 249 | USD 410 |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 44 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Display | 6.3" • IPS LCD PureDisplay • 60Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 16MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 9 Pie | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 161 cheaper
6.2USD 249
vsS2 FEUSD 410
RAM
2 GB more RAM
S2 FE6 GB RAM
vs6.24 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
S2 FE128 GB
vs6.264 GB
Battery
186% larger battery
S2 FE10,000 mAh
vs6.23,500 mAh
Charging
34 W faster wired charging
S2 FE44 W wired
vs6.210 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
6.2Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
vsS2 FEMediaTek Dimensity 7300e
Display
Larger120Hz
S2 FE6.83″ · 120Hz
vs6.26.3″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 6.2
Much lower purchase priceUSD 249
Smaller 6.3-inch display6.3″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S2 FE
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.83″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6.2 vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 6.2, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 3500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP), and 44W charging. Nokia 6.2, however, is around $161 cheaper, lighter at 180 g versus 224 g, and thinner at 8.25 mm versus 8.59 mm. The choice comes down to S2 FE’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 6.2’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
