Nokia 3.4
$179
Nokia 3.4 vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15
$419
| 3.4 | K15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 179 | USD 419 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 80 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250 | MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super |
| Display | 6.39" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED (flexible) • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 240 cheaper
3.4USD 179
vsK15USD 419
RAM
3× more RAM
K1512 GB RAM
vs3.44 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
K15256 GB
vs3.464 GB
Battery
100% larger battery
K158,000 mAh
vs3.44,000 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
K1580 W wired
vs3.410 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
3.4Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250
vsK15MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super
Display
Larger120Hz
K156.59″ · 120Hz
vs3.46.39″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 3.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 179
Smaller 6.39-inch display6.39″
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo K15
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.59″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 3.4 vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 3.4, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 80W charging. Nokia 3.4, however, is around $240 cheaper and lighter at 180 g versus 205 g. The main trade-off is the K15’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the 3.4’s lower price and lighter build.
