Nokia 3.4
$179
Nokia 3.4 vs Motorola Moto G77 Power
Motorola Moto G77 Power
$264
| 3.4 | Moto G77 Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 179 | USD 264 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 30 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250 | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 |
| Display | 6.39" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.72" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 85 cheaper
3.4USD 179
vsMoto G77 PowerUSD 264
RAM
2× more RAM
Moto G77 Power8 GB RAM
vs3.44 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Moto G77 Power128 GB
vs3.464 GB
Battery
75% larger battery
Moto G77 Power7,000 mAh
vs3.44,000 mAh
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Moto G77 Power30 W wired
vs3.410 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
3.4Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250
vsMoto G77 PowerMediaTek Dimensity 6400
Display
Larger120Hz
Moto G77 Power6.72″ · 120Hz
vs3.46.39″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 3.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 179
Smaller 6.39-inch display6.39″
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Moto G77 Power
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.72″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 3.4 vs Motorola Moto G77 Power
Motorola Moto G77 Power offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 3.4, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP), and 30W charging. Nokia 3.4, however, is around $85.00 cheaper and lighter at 180 g versus 215 g. The main trade-off is Moto G77 Power’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 3.4’s lower price and lighter build.
