Lava O2
$102
Lava O2 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| O2 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 102 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 697 cheaper
O2USD 102
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsO28 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Ultra256 GB
vsO2128 GB
Battery
61% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsO25,000 mAh
Charging
82 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsO218 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
O2Unisoc Tiger T616
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Ultra6.9″ · 185Hz
vsO26.5″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceLava O2
Much lower purchase priceUSD 102
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Lava O2 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than O2, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Lava O2, however, is around $697 cheaper and lighter at 200 g versus 235 g. The main trade-off is F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus O2’s lower price and lighter build.
