HTC U24 Pro
$599
HTC U24 Pro vs OnePlus 3T
OnePlus 3T
$439
| U24 Pro | 3T | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 599 | USD 439 |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 60 | 20 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SM7550-AB | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 |
| Display | 6.8" • Curved OLED • 120Hz | 5.5" • Optic AMOLED • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 16MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android Android 14 | Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 160 cheaper
3TUSD 439
vsU24 ProUSD 599
RAM
2× more RAM
U24 Pro12 GB RAM
vs3T6 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
U24 Pro256 GB
vs3T64 GB
Battery
35% larger battery
U24 Pro4,600 mAh
vs3T3,400 mAh
Charging
40 W faster wired charging
U24 Pro60 W wired
vs3T20 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
U24 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SM7550-AB
vs3TQualcomm Snapdragon 821
Display
Larger120Hz
U24 Pro6.8″ · 120Hz
vs3T5.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareHTC U24 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery4,600 mAh
Faster wired charging60 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.8″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceOnePlus 3T
Much lower purchase priceUSD 439
Smaller 5.5-inch display5.5″
What CompareTab says about HTC U24 Pro vs OnePlus 3T
HTC U24 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 3T, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 4600 mAh battery versus 3400 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 60W charging. OnePlus 3T, however, is around $160 cheaper, lighter at 158 g versus 198.7 g, and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 8.98 mm. The main trade-off is U24 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 3T’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
