Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
$1,899
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs OPPO A16
OPPO A16
$190
| Pixel 11 Pro Fold | A16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 1,899 | USD 190 |
| Battery | 4806 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 10 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G6 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
| Display | 8" • Super Actua Flex OLED • 120Hz | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 10MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 1,709 cheaper
A16USD 190
vsPixel 11 Pro FoldUSD 1,899
RAM
4× more RAM
Pixel 11 Pro Fold16 GB RAM
vsA164 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Pixel 11 Pro Fold256 GB
vsA1664 GB
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Pixel 11 Pro Fold30 W wired
vsA1610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Pixel 11 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G6
vsA16MediaTek Helio G35
Display
Larger120Hz
Pixel 11 Pro Fold8″ · 120Hz
vsA166.52″ · 60Hz
Build
49 g lighter
A16190 g
vsPixel 11 Pro Fold239 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareGoogle Pixel 11 Pro Fold
More RAM and storage16 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Larger 120Hz display8″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16
Much lower purchase priceUSD 190
Lighter build190 g
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
What CompareTab says about Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs OPPO A16
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than A16, with 16 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 30 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (48 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. OPPO A16, however, is around $1,709 cheaper, lighter at 190 g versus 239 g, and thinner at 8.4 mm versus 10.1 mm. The choice comes down to Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus A16’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
