Apple iPhone 8
$699
Apple iPhone 8 vs OPPO Reno 16c
OPPO Reno 16c
$539
| iPhone 8 | Reno 16c | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 699 | USD 539 |
| Battery | 1821 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 80 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Apple A11 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy |
| Display | 4.7" • Retina HD IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.57" • Crystal Guard AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 7MP | 50MP |
| OS | iOS iOS 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 160 cheaper
Reno 16cUSD 539
vsiPhone 8USD 699
RAM
4× more RAM
Reno 16c8 GB RAM
vsiPhone 82 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Reno 16c128 GB
vsiPhone 864 GB
Battery
284% larger battery
Reno 16c7,000 mAh
vsiPhone 81,821 mAh
Charging
62 W faster wired charging
Reno 16c80 W wired
vsiPhone 818 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
iPhone 8Apple A11 Bionic
vsReno 16cMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display
Larger120Hz
Reno 16c6.57″ · 120Hz
vsiPhone 84.7″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno 16c
Much lower purchase priceUSD 539
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
What CompareTab says about Apple iPhone 8 vs OPPO Reno 16c
OPPO Reno 16c offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than iPhone 8, with 8 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 1821 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 12 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 7 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 80W charging. Apple iPhone 8, however, is lighter at 148 g versus 195 g and thinner at 7.3 mm versus 8.4 mm. The main trade-off is Reno 16c’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus iPhone 8’s lighter, thinner build.
