Alcatel Pixi
$99
Alcatel Pixi vs Huawei Mate 90 Pro
Huawei Mate 90 Pro
$985
| Pixi | Mate 90 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 99 | USD 985 |
| Battery | 1300 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 100 |
| RAM | N/A | 12 GB |
| Storage | N/A | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM7227A | HiSilicon Kirin 9035 |
| Display | 3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.75" • Dual-layer OLED (LTPO) • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 2MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 2.3.6 Gingerbread | HarmonyOS 7.0 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 886 cheaper
PixiUSD 99
vsMate 90 ProUSD 985
RAM
12 GB more RAM
Mate 90 Pro12 GB RAM
vsPixi0 GB RAM
Storage
256 GB more storage
Mate 90 Pro256 GB
vsPixi0 GB
Battery
408% larger battery
Mate 90 Pro6,600 mAh
vsPixi1,300 mAh
Charging
95 W faster wired charging
Mate 90 Pro100 W wired
vsPixi5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
PixiQualcomm MSM7227A
vsMate 90 ProHiSilicon Kirin 9035
Display
Larger120Hz
Mate 90 Pro6.75″ · 120Hz
vsPixi3.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel Pixi
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareHuawei Mate 90 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,600 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.75″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Alcatel Pixi vs Huawei Mate 90 Pro
Huawei Mate 90 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Pixi, with 12 GB of RAM versus 0.26 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 0.51 GB, a 6600 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 2 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Alcatel Pixi, however, is around $886 cheaper and lighter at 118 g versus 222 g. The main trade-off is Mate 90 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Pixi’s lower price and lighter build.
