Alcatel OT-222
$39
Alcatel OT-222 vs Samsung Galaxy A05 6GB
Samsung Galaxy A05 6GB
$135
| OT-222 | Galaxy A05 6GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 39 | USD 135 |
| Battery | 650 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 2.5 | 25 |
| RAM | N/A | 6 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | N/A | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769V/CZ |
| Display | 1.45" • CSTN LCD, 65K colors • 60Hz | 6.7" • PLS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | N/A | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 8MP |
| OS | Proprietary Alcatel feature-phone platform | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 96 cheaper
OT-222USD 39
vsGalaxy A05 6GBUSD 135
Storage
4× more storage
OT-222512 GB
vsGalaxy A05 6GB128 GB
Battery
669% larger battery
Galaxy A05 6GB5,000 mAh
vsOT-222650 mAh
Charging
23 W faster wired charging
Galaxy A05 6GB25 W wired
vsOT-2223 W wired
Display
Larger display
Galaxy A05 6GB6.7-inch
vsOT-2221.45-inch
Build
124 g lighter
OT-22271 g
vsGalaxy A05 6GB195 g
Build
More compact thickness
Galaxy A05 6GB8.8 mm
vsOT-22211.3 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel OT-222
Much lower purchase priceUSD 39
More storage512 GB
Lighter build71 g
Smaller 1.45-inch display1.45″
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A05 6GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging25 W wired
Larger 6.7-inch6.7-inch
Thinner body8.8 mm
What CompareTab says about Alcatel OT-222 vs Samsung Galaxy A05 6GB
Samsung Galaxy A05 6GB has the larger display and faster wired charging than OT-222, with a 5000 mAh battery versus 650 mAh, a 6.7 inch display versus 1.45 inch, and 25 W wired charging versus 2.5 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP). Alcatel OT-222, however, is around $96.00 cheaper and lighter at 71 g versus 195 g and offers 512 GB of storage versus 128 GB. The main trade-off is the Galaxy A05 6GB’s faster charging, battery capacity, larger display, and higher-resolution front camera versus the OT-222’s lower price and lighter build.
