Alcatel A50
$150
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| A50 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 150 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 44 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6738 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 5.2" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 101.01 cheaper
A50USD 150
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
2× more RAM
Y32 (2026)4 GB RAM
vsA502 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vsA5016 GB
Battery
186% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsA502,800 mAh
Charging
39 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsA505 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A50MediaTek MT6738
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsA505.2″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel A50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 150
Smaller 5.2-inch display5.2″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Alcatel A50 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A50, with 4 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 16 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 2800 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), NFC, and 44W charging. Alcatel A50, however, is around $101 cheaper, lighter at 145.7 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.69 mm. The main trade-off is Y32 (2026)’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A50’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
