Alcatel A50
$150
Alcatel A50 vs ZTE Blade A35
ZTE Blade A35
$99
| A50 | Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 150 | USD 99 |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 10 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6738 | UNISOC SC9863A1 |
| Display | 5.2" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50.99 cheaper
Blade A35USD 99
vsA50USD 150
RAM
2× more RAM
Blade A354 GB RAM
vsA502 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Blade A3564 GB
vsA5016 GB
Battery
79% larger battery
Blade A355,000 mAh
vsA502,800 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Blade A3510 W wired
vsA505 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A50MediaTek MT6738
vsBlade A35UNISOC SC9863A1
Display
Larger90Hz
Blade A356.75″ · 90Hz
vsA505.2″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Blade A35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 64 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging10 W wired
What CompareTab says about Alcatel A50 vs ZTE Blade A35
ZTE Blade A35 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A50, with 4 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 64 GB of storage versus 16 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 2800 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds 10W charging. Alcatel A50, however, is lighter at 145.7 g versus 192 g and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.5 mm. The choice comes down to Blade A35’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A50’s lighter, thinner build.
