Alcatel A50
$150
Alcatel A50 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10 128GB
Xiaomi Redmi 10 128GB
$199
| A50 | Redmi 10 128GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 150 | USD 199 |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 18 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6738 | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Display | 5.2" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.5" • IPS LCD DotDisplay • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 49.01 cheaper
A50USD 150
vsRedmi 10 128GBUSD 199
RAM
3× more RAM
Redmi 10 128GB6 GB RAM
vsA502 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
Redmi 10 128GB128 GB
vsA5016 GB
Battery
79% larger battery
Redmi 10 128GB5,000 mAh
vsA502,800 mAh
Charging
13 W faster wired charging
Redmi 10 128GB18 W wired
vsA505 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A50MediaTek MT6738
vsRedmi 10 128GBMediaTek Helio G88
Display
Larger90Hz
Redmi 10 128GB6.5″ · 90Hz
vsA505.2″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel A50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 150
Smaller 5.2-inch display5.2″
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi Redmi 10 128GB
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.5″ · 90Hz
What CompareTab says about Alcatel A50 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10 128GB
Xiaomi Redmi 10 128GB offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A50, with 6 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 16 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 2800 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, NFC, and 18W charging. Alcatel A50, however, is cheaper at around $149.99 versus $199, lighter at 145.7 g versus 181 g, and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.92 mm. The main trade-off is Redmi 10 128GB’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A50’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
