Alcatel A50
$150
Alcatel A50 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| A50 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 150 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 100 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6738 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 5.2" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 549.01 cheaper
A50USD 150
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
6× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsA502 GB RAM
Storage
16× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsA5016 GB
Battery
126% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsA502,800 mAh
Charging
95 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsA505 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A50MediaTek MT6738
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsA505.2″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel A50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 150
Smaller 5.2-inch display5.2″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Alcatel A50 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A50, with 12 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 16 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 2800 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Alcatel A50, however, is around $549 cheaper, lighter at 145.7 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the A50’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
