vivo X300 E
$719
vivo X300 E vs OPPO Reno 16c
OPPO Reno 16c
$539
| X300 E | Reno 16c | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 719 | USD 539 |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 80 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy |
| Display | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz | 6.57" • Crystal Guard AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 180 cheaper
Reno 16cUSD 539
vsX300 EUSD 719
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X300 E12 GB RAM
vsReno 16c8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X300 E256 GB
vsReno 16c128 GB
Battery
200 mAh larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsReno 16c7,000 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsReno 16c80 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
X300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
vsReno 16cMediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
Display
144 Hz refresh
X300 E144 Hz
vsReno 16c120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO Reno 16c
Much lower purchase priceUSD 539
What CompareTab says about vivo X300 E vs OPPO Reno 16c
vivo X300 E offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Reno 16c, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 7000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds NFC and 90W charging. OPPO Reno 16c, however, is around $180 cheaper. The choice comes down to X300 E’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Reno 16c’s lower price.
