vivo S50
$415
vivo S50 vs OPPO F17 Pro
OPPO F17 Pro
$313
| S50 | F17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 415 | USD 313 |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 4015 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 30 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| Display | 6.59" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.43" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 48MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 102 cheaper
F17 ProUSD 313
vsS50USD 415
RAM
4 GB more RAM
S5012 GB RAM
vsF17 Pro8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
S50256 GB
vsF17 Pro128 GB
Battery
62% larger battery
S506,500 mAh
vsF17 Pro4,015 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
S5090 W wired
vsF17 Pro30 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
S50Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
vsF17 ProMediaTek Helio P95
Display
Larger120Hz
S506.59″ · 120Hz
vsF17 Pro6.43″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S50
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.59″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO F17 Pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 313
Smaller 6.43-inch display6.43″
What CompareTab says about vivo S50 vs OPPO F17 Pro
vivo S50 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than F17 Pro, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6500 mAh battery versus 4015 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 16 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, NFC, and 90W charging. OPPO F17 Pro, however, is around $102 cheaper and lighter at 164 g versus 196 g. The choice comes down to S50’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus F17 Pro’s lower price and lighter build.
