ZTE Blade A35e
$89
ZTE Blade A35e vs Alcatel OT-222
Alcatel OT-222
$39
| Blade A35e | OT-222 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 89 | USD 39 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 650 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 2.5 |
| RAM | 2 GB | N/A |
| Storage | 64 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | N/A |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 1.45" • CSTN LCD, 65K colors • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | N/A |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 0MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Proprietary Alcatel feature-phone platform |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
OT-222USD 39
vsBlade A35eUSD 89
Storage
8× more storage
OT-222512 GB
vsBlade A35e64 GB
Battery
669% larger battery
Blade A35e5,000 mAh
vsOT-222650 mAh
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Blade A35e10 W wired
vsOT-2223 W wired
Display
Larger90Hz
Blade A35e6.52″ · 90Hz
vsOT-2221.45″ · 60Hz
Build
114 g lighter
OT-22271 g
vsBlade A35e185 g
Build
More compact thickness
Blade A35e8.6 mm
vsOT-22211.3 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Blade A35e
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging10 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.52″ · 90Hz
Thinner body8.6 mm
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel OT-222
Much lower purchase priceUSD 39
More storage512 GB
Lighter build71 g
Smaller 1.45-inch display1.45″
What CompareTab says about ZTE Blade A35e vs Alcatel OT-222
ZTE Blade A35e has the larger display and faster wired charging than OT-222, with a 5000 mAh battery versus 650 mAh, a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 10 W wired charging versus 2.5 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP). Alcatel OT-222, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and lighter at 71 g versus 185 g and offers 512 GB of storage versus 64 GB. The main trade-off is the Blade A35e’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus the OT-222’s lower price and lighter build.
