ZTE Blade A35
$99
ZTE Blade A35 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Blade A35 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 99 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | UNISOC SC9863A1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 600 cheaper
Blade A35USD 99
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
3× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsBlade A354 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsBlade A3564 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsBlade A355,000 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsBlade A3510 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Blade A35UNISOC SC9863A1
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger display
Blade A356.75-inch
vsF9 Pro6.59-inch
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Blade A35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Larger 6.75-inch6.75-inch
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about ZTE Blade A35 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Blade A35, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. ZTE Blade A35, however, is around $600 cheaper and lighter at 192 g versus 206 g and has a larger 6.75 inch display. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Blade A35’s lower price, larger display, and lighter build.
