ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
$899
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60
$699
| Axon 60 Ultra | Razr 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 899 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 30 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X |
| Display | 6.78" • OLED • 120Hz | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android (Jingxing OS layer) 14 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 200 cheaper
Razr 60USD 699
vsAxon 60 UltraUSD 899
RAM
2× more RAM
Axon 60 Ultra16 GB RAM
vsRazr 608 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Axon 60 Ultra1,024 GB
vsRazr 60256 GB
Battery
33% larger battery
Axon 60 Ultra6,000 mAh
vsRazr 604,500 mAh
Charging
50 W faster wired charging
Axon 60 Ultra80 W wired
vsRazr 6030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Axon 60 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
vsRazr 60MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
Build
40 g lighter
Razr 60188 g
vsAxon 60 Ultra228 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Axon 60 Ultra
More RAM and storage16 GB RAM · 1,024 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Best if you want
Lower priceMotorola Razr 60
Much lower purchase priceUSD 699
Lighter build188 g
What CompareTab says about ZTE Axon 60 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 60
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than Razr 60, with 16 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 1024 GB of storage versus 256 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and 80 W wired charging versus 30 W. Motorola Razr 60, however, is around $200 cheaper, lighter at 188 g versus 228 g, and thinner at 7.25 mm versus 9.1 mm. The choice comes down to Axon 60 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, and battery capacity versus Razr 60’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
