Xiaomi Poco C85
$129
Xiaomi Poco C85 vs Alcatel PulseMix
Alcatel PulseMix
$80
| Poco C85 | PulseMix | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 129 | USD 80 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra | MediaTek MT6738 |
| Display | 6.9" • IPS LCD • 120Hz | 5.2" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 2MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 49.01 cheaper
PulseMixUSD 79.99
vsPoco C85USD 129
RAM
4× more RAM
Poco C858 GB RAM
vsPulseMix2 GB RAM
Storage
16× more storage
Poco C85256 GB
vsPulseMix16 GB
Battery
114% larger battery
Poco C856,000 mAh
vsPulseMix2,800 mAh
Charging
28 W faster wired charging
Poco C8533 W wired
vsPulseMix5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Poco C85MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra
vsPulseMixMediaTek MT6738
Display
Larger120Hz
Poco C856.9″ · 120Hz
vsPulseMix5.2″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi Poco C85
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging33 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.9″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel PulseMix
Much lower purchase priceUSD 79.99
Smaller 5.2-inch display5.2″
What CompareTab says about Xiaomi Poco C85 vs Alcatel PulseMix
Xiaomi Poco C85 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than PulseMix, with 8 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 16 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 2800 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 2 MP), NFC, and 33W charging. Alcatel PulseMix, however, is cheaper at around $79.99 versus $129 and lighter at 145.7 g versus 205 g. The choice comes down to Poco C85’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus PulseMix’s lower price and lighter build.
