Vivo Y15C
$115
Vivo Y15C vs OPPO A7 Pro 5G
OPPO A7 Pro 5G
$325
| Y15C | A7 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 115 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 45 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 | MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max |
| Display | 6.51" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.57" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 210 cheaper
Y15CUSD 115
vsA7 Pro 5GUSD 325
RAM
2 GB more RAM
A7 Pro 5G6 GB RAM
vsY15C4 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
A7 Pro 5G256 GB
vsY15C64 GB
Battery
60% larger battery
A7 Pro 5G8,000 mAh
vsY15C5,000 mAh
Charging
35 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro 5G45 W wired
vsY15C10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y15CMediaTek Helio P35
vsA7 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max
Display
120 Hz refresh
A7 Pro 5G120 Hz
vsY15C60 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y15C
Much lower purchase priceUSD 115
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro 5G
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.57-inch
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y15C vs OPPO A7 Pro 5G
OPPO A7 Pro 5G offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Y15C, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), and 45W charging. Vivo Y15C, however, is around $210 cheaper, lighter at 179 g versus 205 g, and thinner at 8.28 mm versus 8.8 mm. The choice comes down to A7 Pro 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Y15C’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
