Vivo V23
$399
Vivo V23 vs Samsung Galaxy F35 5G
Samsung Galaxy F35 5G
$299
| V23 | Galaxy F35 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 399 | USD 299 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 44 | 25 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| Display | 6.44" • AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 100 cheaper
Galaxy F35 5GUSD 299
vsV23USD 399
RAM
4 GB more RAM
V2312 GB RAM
vsGalaxy F35 5G8 GB RAM
Battery
43% larger battery
Galaxy F35 5G6,000 mAh
vsV234,200 mAh
Charging
19 W faster wired charging
V2344 W wired
vsGalaxy F35 5G25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
V23MediaTek Dimensity 920
vsGalaxy F35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380
Display
Larger120Hz
Galaxy F35 5G6.6″ · 120Hz
vsV236.44″ · 90Hz
Build
41 g lighter
V23181 g
vsGalaxy F35 5G222 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo V23
More RAM12 GB RAM
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Lighter build181 g
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy F35 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 299
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Larger 120Hz display6.6″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Vivo V23 vs Samsung Galaxy F35 5G
Vivo V23 offers more RAM and a more versatile camera setup than Galaxy F35 5G, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 44 W wired charging versus 25 W, a higher-resolution 64 MP rear camera versus 50 MP, and a higher-resolution 50 MP front camera versus 13 MP. Samsung Galaxy F35 5G, however, is around $100 cheaper and has a larger 6000 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh and a larger 6.6 inch display. The choice comes down to V23’s extra RAM, faster charging, and higher-resolution cameras versus Galaxy F35 5G’s lower price, larger battery, and larger display.
