Vivo V15 Pro
$400
Vivo V15 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A26
Samsung Galaxy A26
$300
| V15 Pro | Galaxy A26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 400 | USD 300 |
| Battery | 3700 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 25 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| Display | 6.39" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 100.01 cheaper
Galaxy A26USD 300
vsV15 ProUSD 400
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Galaxy A268 GB RAM
vsV15 Pro6 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy A26256 GB
vsV15 Pro128 GB
Battery
35% larger battery
Galaxy A265,000 mAh
vsV15 Pro3,700 mAh
Charging
7 W faster wired charging
Galaxy A2625 W wired
vsV15 Pro18 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
V15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 675
vsGalaxy A26Samsung Exynos 1380
Display
Larger120Hz
Galaxy A266.7″ · 120Hz
vsV15 Pro6.39″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A26
Much lower purchase priceUSD 300
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging25 W wired
What CompareTab says about Vivo V15 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A26
Samsung Galaxy A26 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than V15 Pro, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 3700 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds optical image stabilization on the main camera, NFC, and 25W charging. Vivo V15 Pro, however, is lighter at 185 g versus 200 g and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The choice comes down to Galaxy A26’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus V15 Pro’s lighter build and higher-resolution front camera.
