TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
$490
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| CAMON Slim 5G | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 490 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 44 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.78" • 1.5K AMOLED • 144Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 239 cheaper
Y32 (2026)USD 251
vsCAMON Slim 5GUSD 490
RAM
2× more RAM
CAMON Slim 5G8 GB RAM
vsY32 (2026)4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
CAMON Slim 5G256 GB
vsY32 (2026)128 GB
Battery
33% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsCAMON Slim 5G6,000 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
CAMON Slim 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7300e
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
144 Hz refresh
CAMON Slim 5G144 Hz
vsY32 (2026)120 Hz
Build
39 g lighter
CAMON Slim 5G190 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareTECNO CAMON Slim 5G
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Up to 144 Hz display6.78-inch
Lighter build190 g
Best if you want
Lower pricevivo Y32 (2026)
Much lower purchase priceUSD 251
Larger battery8,000 mAh
What CompareTab says about TECNO CAMON Slim 5G vs vivo Y32 (2026)
TECNO CAMON Slim 5G has more RAM and storage than Y32 (2026), with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP) and an ultrawide rear camera. vivo Y32 (2026), however, is around $239 cheaper and has a larger 8000 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh. The choice comes down to CAMON Slim 5G’s extra RAM, storage, smoother display, and camera features versus Y32 (2026)’s lower price and larger battery.
