TCL 60R
$129
TCL 60R vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| 60R | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 129 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.7" • IPS LCD • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 570 cheaper
60RUSD 129
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
3× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vs60R4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vs60R128 GB
Battery
22% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vs60R5,200 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
60RMediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vs60R120 Hz
Build
16 g lighter
60R190 g
vsF9 Pro206 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceTCL 60R
Much lower purchase priceUSD 129
Lighter build190 g
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about TCL 60R vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 60R, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5200 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. TCL 60R, however, is around $570 cheaper, lighter at 190 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 8.16 mm versus 8.79 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus 60R’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
