TCL 50 SE
$169
TCL 50 SE vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| 50 SE | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 169 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5010 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G88 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.78" • IPS LCD with NXTVISION technology • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 530 cheaper
50 SEUSD 169
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
2× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vs50 SE6 GB RAM
Battery
26% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vs50 SE5,010 mAh
Charging
67 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vs50 SE33 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
50 SEMediaTek Helio G88
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger display
50 SE6.78-inch
vsF9 Pro6.59-inch
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vs50 SE90 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceTCL 50 SE
Much lower purchase priceUSD 169
Larger 6.78-inch6.78-inch
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about TCL 50 SE vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM and faster wired charging than 50 SE, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5010 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 33 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. TCL 50 SE, however, is around $530 cheaper, lighter at 195 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 8.09 mm versus 8.79 mm and has a larger 6.78 inch display. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus the 50 SE’s lower price, larger display, and lighter, thinner build.
