TCL 50 SE
$169
TCL 50 SE vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
$325
| 50 SE | A7 Pro Max 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 169 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 5010 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 80 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G88 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.78" • IPS LCD with NXTVISION technology • 90Hz | 6.78" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 156 cheaper
50 SEUSD 169
vsA7 Pro Max 5GUSD 325
RAM
2 GB more RAM
A7 Pro Max 5G8 GB RAM
vs50 SE6 GB RAM
Battery
100% larger battery
A7 Pro Max 5G10,000 mAh
vs50 SE5,010 mAh
Charging
47 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro Max 5G80 W wired
vs50 SE33 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
50 SEMediaTek Helio G88
vsA7 Pro Max 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
Display
120 Hz refresh
A7 Pro Max 5G120 Hz
vs50 SE90 Hz
Build
29 g lighter
50 SE195 g
vsA7 Pro Max 5G224 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceTCL 50 SE
Much lower purchase priceUSD 169
Lighter build195 g
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
More RAM8 GB RAM
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.78-inch
What CompareTab says about TCL 50 SE vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G offers more RAM and faster wired charging than 50 SE, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 5010 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 33 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP) and optical image stabilization on the main camera. TCL 50 SE, however, is around $156 cheaper, lighter at 195 g versus 224 g, and thinner at 8.09 mm versus 8.57 mm. The main trade-off is A7 Pro Max 5G’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus 50 SE’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
