Samsung Galaxy S9
$720
Samsung Galaxy S9 vs vivo S60t
vivo S60t
$540
| Galaxy S9 | S60t | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 720 | USD 540 |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 90 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Display | 5.8" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 8.0 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 179.99 cheaper
S60tUSD 540
vsGalaxy S9USD 720
RAM
3× more RAM
S60t12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy S94 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
S60t256 GB
vsGalaxy S964 GB
Battery
140% larger battery
S60t7,200 mAh
vsGalaxy S93,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
S60t90 W wired
vsGalaxy S915 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy S9Samsung Exynos 9810
vsS60tQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Display
Larger144Hz
S60t6.59″ · 144Hz
vsGalaxy S95.8″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S60t
Much lower purchase priceUSD 540
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy S9 vs vivo S60t
vivo S60t has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy S9, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 3000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 12 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy S9, however, is lighter at 163 g versus 207 g. The choice comes down to S60t’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy S9’s lighter build.
